Skip to main content
Contact
Further Help
Subscribe
Search
About
About
Making a submission
Law reform process
President
Commissioners
Corporate information
Annual Reports
Access to information
Public Interest Disclosure
Careers
Current Inquiries
Current Inquiries
Justice Responses to Sexual Violence
Review of the Future Acts Regime
Past Inquiries
Past Inquiries
Review of the Legislative Framework for Corporations and Financial Services Regulation
Religious Educational Institutions and Anti-Discrimination Laws
Review of Judicial Impartiality
Corporate Criminal Responsibility
2016 – 2020
2011 – 2015
2006 – 2010
2001 – 2005
1996 – 2000
1991 – 1995
1986 – 1990
1981 – 1985
1975 – 1980
Publications
Publications
Final Report
Consultation Documentation
Information Sheets
Reform journal
Submissions made by the ALRC
News and Media
News and Media
ALRC News
Media Release
ALRC in the media
Podcast & Video
Presentations & Articles
Newsletter
Implementation
DataHub
DataHub
The Commonwealth Statute Book
Legislative Complexity and Law Design
Topics of Interest
Download the Data
Home
/
Past Inquiries
/
Review of Judicial Impartiality
/
Public Engagement
12.03.2021
Public Engagement
Public engagement with the ALRC Judicial Impartiality Inquiry.
Type
Headline
Date
Organisation
Media
Law Council backs call for feedback on judicial commission
18/01/2023
Proctor
Media
Amid push for reforms, judges refuse to recuse themselves time and again
18/01/2023
Lawyerly
Media
AGD seeks feedback on potential federal judicial commission
18/01/2023
The Mandarin
Media
Consultation opens for federal judicial commission
17/01/2023
The Australian
Media
Federal judicial commission could consider complaints about current, former judges
17/01/2023
Lawyers Weekly
Media
Judicial commission would be ‘protective, not disciplinary’, government says
17/01/2023
Lawyerly
Media
AGD seeks feedback on potential federal judicial commission
18/01/2023
The Mandarin
Media
Judicial commission would be ‘protective, not disciplinary’, government says
17/01/2023
Lawyerly
Media
Government flags reforms to copyright laws
24/11/2022
Lawyerly
Media
Judges shouldn’t be immune to political scrutiny
18/10/2022
Australian Financial Review
Media
‘Australians should be able to see themselves reflected in the judiciary’, says A-G
17/10/2022
Lawyers Weekly
Article
Gender order judged wise: Women fill the High Court bench
16/10/2022
Independent Australia
Media
Ads for new judges could be in store as AG vows transparent system for appointments
12/10/2022
Lawyerly
Media
High Court judge backs Labor move on appointments
9/10/2022
Australian Financial Review
Media
The High Court’s newest justice, Jayne Jagot
8/10/2022
The Saturday Paper
Media
Dreyfus to consult courts on complaints body
6/10/2022
Australian Financial Review
Article
The High Court of Australia has a majority of women justices for the first time. Here’s why that matters
4/10/2022
The Conversation
Media
Federal government to establish judicial commission and improve appointment transparency
2/10/2022
Lawyers Weekly
Media
New judicial commission among reforms to boost public confidence in Australia’s legal system
29/09/2022
The Mandarin
Media
Judicial misconduct reforms win government support as court again overturns Judge Street
29/09/2022
Lawyerly
Media Release
Integrity of the judiciary essential
29/09/2022
Law Council of Australia
Media
The case for judging bias through track records
23/09/2022
The Australian
Article
Boardroom Brief: Week commencing 22 August 2022
23/08/2022
Gilbert + Tobin
Media
Forum Finance judge recuses himself after questioning director’s credibility
19/08/2022
Lawyerly
Article
Data and Judicial Impartiality
19/08/2022
Australian Public Law Blog
Article
Nothing to fear and much to be gained from a federal judicial commission
19/08/2022
Australian Public Law Blog
Article
Bias and judicial education
19/08/2022
Australian Public Law Blog
Article
Worth Waiting For: The ALRCs Without Fear or Favour Report
19/08/2022
Australian Public Law Blog
Article
The ALRC on judicial impartiality – and the momentum towards judicial appointments reform
12/08/2022
Australian Public Law Blog
Article
Without Fear or Favour: The ALRC’s Report on Judicial Impartiality
12/08/2022
Australian Public Law Blog
Media
Life, death and the law
09/08/2022
The Law Report
Media
New data reveals decisions about an asylum seeker’s visa can vary depending on which judge they get
04/08/2022
ABC News
Media
Need for certainty, visibility underscored in judicial bias report
03/08/2022
The Mandarin
Article
Judges need better education and structures to improve impartiality: report
02/08/2022
The Conversation
Article
Judicial impartiality in a changing world
02/08/2022
Proctor
Media
Federal judicial commission needed, says report
02/08/2022
Lawyers Weekly
Media
ALRC judicial impartiality report released
02/08/2022
Proctor
Media
Judges are mostly Anglo-Celtic, married and only speak English
02/08/2022
Australian Financial Review
Media
ALRC calls for federal judicial commission to deal with complaints against judges
02/08/2022
Lawyerly
Media
Transparency calls for judge appointments
02/08/2022
Perth Now
Media
Release of Australian Law Reform Commission’s inquiry into judicial impartiality and law on bias
02/08/2022
The National Tribune
Webinar
Fiat Justitia Lecture 2022 – Without Fear or Favour
07/06/2022
Monash University
Media
Judicial impartiality final report to be handed down soon
09/12/2021
Lawyers Weekly
Media
Judicial impartiality, and court disclosure obligations for electronic evidence
12/10/2021
The Law Report
Media
High Court ruling on relationship between judge and barrister may have major repercussions on judicial wellbeing
14/10/2021
Lawyers Weekly
Media
Who do you trust? Uni researchers beat judges
16/09/2021
Australian Financial Review
Media
Legal practitioners report experiences with judicial biases
13/09/2021
Lawyers Weekly
Media
Australian judges should not be able to rule on self-recusal, review told
18/08/2021
The Guardian
Media
Addressing the current (and flawed) tests for biases in courtrooms
16/08/2021
Lawyers Weekly
Media
Reform call after judge’s ‘inexcusable’ conduct
08/07/2021
The Australian
Media
Judge’s secret romance triggers courtroom conflict of interest
30/05/2021
The Mandarin
Media
Calls for independent review into Australian judge and barrister’s undeclared relationship
24/05/2021
The Guardian
Webinar
Balancing the Scales: the Importance of Judicial Diversity
18/05/2021
The Progressive Law Network
Media
Woke insurgency and its weapons of mass destruction
06/05/2021
Spectator Australia
Media
Review considers shake-up of federal judicial appointments
03/05/2021
The Sydney Morning Herald
Media
Review considers shake-up of federal judicial appointments
03/05/2021
The Age
Media
Review considers shake-up of federal judicial appointments
03/05/2021
Brisbane Times
Media
Review considers shake-up of federal judicial appointments
03/05/2021
WA Today
Media
Review considers shake-up of federal judicial appointments
03/05/2021
Daily Legal Press
Media
Self-disqualified judges, overhauled federal appointment process front of mind for judicial impartiality inquiry
02/05/2021
Lawyers Weekly
Media
Should judges decide if they are biased?
30/04/2021
Australian Financial Review
Media
Clarity sought on judicial bias
30/04/2021
The Australian
Media
Validation Act must go to repair ICAC damage
30/04/2021
The Australian
Media
High Court reviews ‘inexcusable’ relationship between judge and barrister
25/04/2021
Lawyers Weekly
Media
Australian judge and barrister involved in same case fail to declare relationship
23/04/2021
The Guardian
Media
Judicial commission needed to help judges’ welfare
11/03/2021
The Australian
Media
Is it OK for judges, barristers to meet? High Court to rule
12/02/2021
The Australian
Article
ALRC launches probe into judicial bias
19/01/2021
LSJ Online
Radio
Claremont murder trial, judges and apprehended bias and Victorian children on remand who never receive a custodial sentence
29/09/2020
Law Report with Damien Carrick
Media
Probes to review judicial bias and financial probity
11/09/2020
The Australian
Media
Attorney-General wants to simplify corporations, finance regulation
11/09/2020
Australian Financial Review
Back to top
Home
About
About
Making a submission
Law reform process
President
Commissioners
Corporate information
Annual Reports
Access to information
Careers
Public Interest Disclosure
Current Inquiries
Current Inquiries
Where next for law reform?
The Framework of Religious Exemptions in Anti-discrimination Legislation
Australia’s Corporate Criminal Responsibility Regime
Past Inquiries
Past Inquiries
Family Law
Incarceration Rates
Litigation Funding
Elder Abuse
2016 – 2020
2011 – 2015
2006 – 2010
2001 – 2005
1996 – 2000
1991 – 1995
1986 – 1990
1981 – 1985
1975 – 1980
Publications
Publications
Final Report
Discussion Paper
Issues / Background Paper
Information Sheets
Submissions made by the ALRC
News and Media
News and Media
Media Release
ALRC News
Podcast / Video
Presentation
Implementation
DataHub
DataHub
The Commonwealth Statute Book
Legislative Complexity and Law Design
Topics of Interest
Download the Data
Contact
Further Help
Close
Stay informed with all of the latest news from the ALRC. Sign up to receive email updates.
First Name
*
Surname
*
Organisation
Email
*
All news
General ALRC updates
Justice Responses to Sexual Violence
Native Title Future Acts Regime
By submitting you are agreeing to our
Terms and Conditions
. You can view our Privacy Policy
here
Email
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This iframe contains the logic required to handle Ajax powered Gravity Forms.
Close
Type to search
Search
Search for filters
All content
Inquiries
Publications
Media releases
Search
Close