12.10.2011

Financial Statements

Statement of comprehensive income For the period ended 30 June 2011   Notes 2011 $ 2010 $ EXPENSES Employee benefits 3A 2,095,719 2,374,022 Suppliers 3B 1,983,411 1,129,322 Depreciation and amortisation 3C 164,625 72,896 Finance costs 3D 4,842 4,842 Write-down and impairment of assets 3E 79,096 – Total expenses   4,327,693 3,581,082 LESS OWN-SOURCE INCOME Own-source

Publications

Read more
12.10.2011

President’s Overview

Audio: Professor Croucher delivers the President’s Overview In presenting the 2010–11 Annual Report, I am extremely proud of the work that the ALRC has continued to deliver during a time of significant organisational change. Over the past twelve months, the ALRC has produced six consultation papers and two final reports and has worked on four

Publications

Read more
11.10.2011

Outcome Report

Image: Family Violence Final Report Launch — ALRC part-time Commissioner, Magistrate Anne Goldsbrough; Attorney-General, the Hon Robert McClelland; ALRC President, Professor Rosalind Croucher; NSWLRC Commissioner, Professor Hilary Astor; NSW Attorney General, John Hatzistergos; NSWLRC Chairman, the Hon James Wood. The Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) supports the Attorney-General and the Government in the maintenance and improvement

Publications

Read more
11.10.2011

Senate Inquiry into the Role and Functions of the ALRC

On 23 November 2010 the Senate referred an Inquiry into the Australian Law Reform Commission to the Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee. Senator Guy Barnett, Chair of the Senate Committee, chaired this Inquiry. At the beginning of the process he stated that ‘over the last three years the ALRC’s resources have been stripped disproportionately

Publications

Read more
30.09.2011

Overview of Discussion Paper

The Discussion Paper comprises 14 chapters divided into three parts. ‘Part 1—Introduction’ contains five chapters that introduce and provide background to the Inquiry, ‘Part 2—A New Classification System’ contains five chapters that outline the ALRC’s proposed new classification scheme, and ‘Part 3—Administering and Enforcing the New Scheme’ contains four chapters outlining the ALRC’s proposals with

Publications

Read more
29.09.2011

Podcast: The National Classification Review Discussion Paper

Commissioner in charge of the Review, Professor Terry Flew, talks about problems inherent in the current system, and the new model proposed in the ALRC Discussion Paper. Audio Download / listen to audio >> Transcript Sabina Wynn (SW): Hello, I’m Sabina Wynn, the Executive Director of the Australian Law Reform Commission and I’m here with

News/Media Release

Read more
29.09.2011

Criticisms of the current scope of RC

10.47 A number of criticisms have been made of aspects of the RC classification in the academic literature—for example, in respect of the ambiguity of the terms and concepts used;[68] concerns about the community standards basis;[69] as well as concerns about overly restricting speech[70] (including in respect of the proposed mandatory internet service level filter);[71]

Publications

Read more
29.09.2011

Methods of restricting access

8.19 In this Discussion Paper, the ALRC proposes that access to certain content—classified and unclassified—should continue to be restricted to adults.[10] This paper also assumes that certain content will continue to be prohibited even to adults (although what this content should be is discussed in Chapter 10). This section considers methods of restricting access, online

Publications

Read more
29.09.2011

Benefits of the proposed new National Classification Scheme

Promoting platform neutrality5.4 The proposed new National Classification Scheme would promote platform neutrality in classification law, as discussed in Chapter 4. Platform neutrality means that, as outlined in Principle 8, there should be a uniform approach to the same or similar content, regardless of the medium of delivery.5.5 This helps avoid inconsistencies that are manifest

Publications

Read more
29.09.2011

Guiding Principles

Principle 1: Individual rightsAustralians should be able to read, hear, see and participate in media of their choice.4.7 The National Classification Code as it currently exists contains the unambiguous statement that ‘adults should be able to read, hear and see what they want’.[2] Similarly, the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (Cth) contains a statutory objective ‘to

Publications

Read more