17.08.2010

Client legal privilege

14.43 At common law, legal professional privilege (now characterised as client legal privilege under the uniform Evidence Acts) protected confidential communications between a lawyer and client from compulsory production in the context of court and similar proceedings.14.44 The rationale for the creation of the privilege was to enhance the administration of justice and the proper

Publications

Read more
16.08.2010

Electronic communications

6.43 Section 71 of the uniform Evidence Acts provides that:The hearsay rule does not apply to a representation contained in a document recording a message that has been transmitted by electronic mail or by a fax, telegram, lettergram or telex so far as the representation is a representation as to:(a) the identity of the person

Publications

Read more
16.08.2010

Discussion Paper proposal

51.47 In DP 72, the ALRC identified support in submissions and consultations for a requirement that data users notify individuals of a breach of their personal information in certain circumstances.[78] Supporters of a data breach notification law gave a number of reasons why such a law would be valuable. These include that it would:provide a

Publications

Read more
16.08.2010

Enforcing ‘own motion’ investigations

Background50.2 In addition to the Commissioner’s power to investigate an act or practice when a complaint has been made, the Commissioner also can investigate an act or practice on his or her own motion where the Commissioner considers it desirable that the act or practice be investigated.[1] Own motion investigations are used by the OPC

Publications

Read more
16.08.2010

Enforcing determinations

50.18 The Privacy Act contains provisions for the enforcement of determinations made under s 52. These mechanisms are different, depending on whether the respondent is an agency or organisation. Enforcing determinations against organisations50.19 The respondent to a determination under s 52 or an approved privacy code must not repeat or continue conduct covered by a

Publications

Read more
16.08.2010

Other enforcement mechanisms following non-compliance

Enforcement pyramid50.35 As discussed in Chapter 4, Professors Ian Ayres and John Braithwaite have suggested that the ideal regulatory approach to enforcing compliance with regulation is through the adoption of an explicit ‘enforcement pyramid’. Under such a model, regulators use coercive sanctions only when less interventionist measures have failed to produce compliance.[59] Breaches of increasing

Publications

Read more
16.08.2010

Investigating privacy complaints

Background49.3 The Commissioner’s powers to investigate complaints of a breach of the Information Privacy Principles (IPPs) and the National Privacy Principles (NPPs) are established in separate paragraphs of s 27(1) of the Privacy Act.[1] These powers are activated by a ‘complaint’. The Act confers rights on individuals to complain to the Commissioner about acts or

Publications

Read more
16.08.2010

Transferring complaints to other bodies

Background49.14 The Privacy Act contemplates the use of other bodies to resolve privacy complaints. For example, a privacy code approved under the Act may provide procedures for dealing with complaints under the code. The Privacy Act also vests the Commissioner with discretion to refer complaints to other bodies. Where the Commissioner forms the view that

Publications

Read more
16.08.2010

Resolution of privacy complaints

Model under the Privacy Act49.39 The Privacy Act provides two formal ways of resolving a complaint following an investigation. First, the Commissioner can endeavour, by conciliation, to effect a settlement between the complainant and respondent.[46] Secondly, the Commissioner can make a determination either dismissing the complaint or finding the complaint substantiated.[47]Conciliation49.40 The Commissioner is given

Publications

Read more
16.08.2010

Accountability and transparency

Background49.74 A number of stakeholders to this Inquiry submitted that transparency and accountability in complaint handling under the Privacy Act should be improved. Two methods of improving transparency and accountability are merits review of the Commissioner’s determinations and providing more guidance on the OPC’s complaint-handling policies and procedures. Merits reviewBackground49.75 The right to merits review

Publications

Read more