2. Preliminary analysis

Problem identification

The key problems that are sought to be addressed by this inquiry include the following:

  • Regulation is overly complex and unwieldy, making it difficult for regulators, regulated entities, government agencies, courts, and legal practitioners to keep track of the body of regulatory materials.
  • There are a large number of definitions scattered throughout legislation, and many key terms are defined differently within and between related statutes. In addition, many similar concepts and norms are described in different terms in different statutes.
  • Definitions are frequently used as a means of ‘switching on and off’ sets of substantive obligations, rather than being used to elucidate meaning. As a result, multiple layers of detailed exceptions and qualifications to definitions are scattered across legislative sources, such that it becomes a drawn-out process to identify when particular obligations apply.
  • There is no identifiable principled basis on which applicable rules are contained in and allocated between: primary legislation, delegated legislation, and soft law (such as regulatory guidance).
  • Delegated legislation, including legislative instruments issued by regulators, are frequently used to substantively amend primary legislation, with implications for transparency, navigability, and broader rule of law objectives.
  • The structure and framing of Chapter 7 of the Corporations Act do not provide clear links between the individual provisions and the fundamental norms of behaviour that they seek to pursue, as recommended by the Financial Services Royal Commission.
  • An overly prescriptive approach to regulation creates risks of regulatory arbitrage (eg the design or provision of products and services to circumvent the requirements), adds to compliance costs, and reduces productivity.

Outcomes

The inquiry aims to achieve the following high-level outcomes:

  • A legal framework that supports a productive and agile financial services sector while protecting consumers;
  • Navigable regulation (greater ease in finding, understanding and complying with the relevant rules);
  • Simplification (primarily reducing unnecessary complexity, including overlapping, inconsistent, and overly prescriptive rules);
  • Clarity of obligations, and the fundamental norms of behaviour to which obligations are directed;
  • Identification and clarification of the underlying policy objectives of Chapter 7 of the Corporations Act, and an assessment of the extent to which key provisions give effect to those objectives consistently and coherently;
  • Regulation that is technology-neutral and supportive of innovation;
  • Transparent and appropriate use of the legislative and regulatory hierarchy;
  • A manageable regulatory framework for regulators and government agencies to administer, and for industry to implement and comply with, efficiently and effectively.

next >>

The focus of this inquiry is financial services regulation. The Terms of Reference (ToR) set out three sub-topics, each of which is to be the subject of a separate Interim Report:

  • the use of definitions;
  • regulatory design and hierarchy of laws; and
  • the framing or structuring of Chapter 7 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).

Each Interim Report, along with the Final Report, must be tabled by the Attorney-General in Parliament (within 15 sitting days), in accordance with the ALRC’s governing statute. Each Interim Report will contain specific options for reform, on which stakeholders and the public will be invited to make submissions.

In preparing the Final Report, the ALRC will take into account stakeholder feedback received on the options set out in the Interim Reports in developing a final set of specific recommendations for reform.

The ToR emphasise the importance of ‘simplifying’ the law ‘within the context of existing policy settings’. The ALRC understands that the government’s intention is that the inquiry be primarily a technical exercise focused on legislative design, rather than an interrogation of the fundamental policy settings underpinning the existing regulatory framework. Nevertheless, it is likely that any amendments to legislation, including technical amendments relating to structure, design and framing, will have policy implications.

next >>

This sets out the ALRC’s approach to this multi-year inquiry. It briefly outlines the structure of the inquiry, a preliminary analysis of existing problems and intended inquiry outcomes, and a description of some of the key topics to be addressed in the course of the inquiry.

1. Introduction

2. Preliminary analysis

3. Context

4. Scope of inquiry

Public engagement taking place in 2020 following the release of the Final Report, Pathways to Justice–Inquiry into the Incarceration Rate of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples (ALRC Report 133).

Type

Title

Date

Organisation

Article

Black Lives Matter movement in Australia: First Nations perspectives

19/01/2021

UNSW Newsroom

Article

‘disappointing’ NSW Budget holds back on funding for Walama court, First Nations

18/11/2020

Mirage News

Article

Establishing Walama Court must not be ignored in NSW budget or justice system

13/11/2020

Mirage News

Article

Time to revisit ALRC report to close justice gap

2/11/2020

Law Council of Australia

Article

Nathan Reynolds’ coronial inquiry hears evidence of systemic neglect, cruelty

30/10/2020

Green Left

Event

Closing the Gap: Implementing the ALRC’s Pathways to Justice Roadmap

28/10/2020

Law Council of Australia

Media

Stop reporting and start doing, lawyers tell NSW inquiry into ‘inhumane’ Indigenous incarceration

26/10/2020

The Guardian

Media

Legal system marred by ‘deep and historical’ injustices

6/10/2020

Queensland Times

Media

The suburbs and towns that copped the most pandemic fines

27/09/2020

Brisbane Times

Article

Time to repeal the NSW crime of offensive language

22/09/2020

Sydney Criminal Lawyers

Event

First Nations Justice and civil liberties challenges for Indigenous Australians

11/09/2020

NSW Council for Civil Liberties

Article

ACT Election 2020: Delivering promise of a Human Rights jurisdiction

10/09/2020

ACT Council of Social Service (ACTCOSS)

Article

Criminologists Call for Divestment in Police and Prisons to End First Nations Injustice

8/09/2020

Sydney Criminal Lawyers

Media

Our Lives Matter: The Shocking Truth of Indigenous

4/09/2020

The Advertiser

Media

It’s time to raise the age: Aboriginal children’s lives matter

29/08/2020

Brisbane Times

Article

Open letter calls for urgent action to address over-incarceration of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people

26/08/2020

UNSW Newsroom

Media

Justice targets are a ‘wish list’ that lack real ambition, legal bodies say

3/08/2020

Lawyers Weekly

Article

Australian Bar Association joins expression of disappointment at Commonwealth’s justice targets

3/08/2020

Australian Bar Association

Article

Justice targets are just a wish list

31/07/2020

Law Council of Australia

Article

Targets miss mark on justice for First Nations

30/07/2020

Mirage News

Media

What next for BLM? How a new role could help end Indigenous deaths in custody

27/07/2020

SBS News

Media

Vickie Roach saw her first death in custody at 18. She’s spent the decades since fighting to abolish prisons

9/07/2020

ABC News

Media

Closing the gap progress can’t take 73 years: Ken Wyatt

3/07/2020

The Australian Financial Review

Article

Kirby Institute stands against racism, urgently calls for an end to over-incarceration and Aboriginal deaths in custody

30/06/2020

UNSW Newsroom

Article

WA passes laws to stop vulnerable people going to jail for unpaid fines

19/06/2020

Pro Bono Australia

Media

How does Australia address worsening Indigenous incarceration rates? Focus on these three things

16/06/2020

News.com.au

Media

What will it take for governments to recognise Australia’s justice gap is a national tragedy?

16/06/2020

The Guardian

Media

Federal government funds Victoria’s Indigenous custody service

13/06/2020

Brisbane Times

Media

Justice groups issue five-point plan to reduce Indigenous imprisonment

12/06/2020

The Guardian

Media

Indigenous court needed in NSW to close gap and focus on rehabilitation, say advocates

11/06/2020

SBS News

Media

NSW ‘indigenous court needed’ to close gap

10/06/2020

9News

Media

Nothing changes’: Indigenous leader wants action on incarceration rate

10/06/2020

Brisbane Times

Media

Premier needs to act on model to save black lives

9/06/2020

WA Today

Media

Professor Marcia Langton AO calls on governments to listen to Black Lives Matter protesters

8/06/2020

ABC News

Media

On Saturday, amid protests for Black Lives Matter, an Indigenous man died in police custody.

7/06/2020

Mamamia

Media

Aboriginal deaths in custody: 434 have died since 1991, new data shows

6/06/2020

The Guardian

Article

Urgent need to address Australia’s national disgrace

4/06/2020

Oxfam Australia

Article

Calls to end Indigenous deaths in custody

3/06/2020

Australian Human Rights Commission

Media

16 facts you need to know about Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians.

2/06/2020

Mamamia

Media

NSW Bar renews calls for Walama Court

29/05/2020

Lawyers Weekly

Media

Circle sentencing success strengthens case for a Walama Court in NSW

26/05/2020

Mirage News

Media

My son should not have died’: Prison death of Indigenous man is much more than an ‘isolated tragedy’

16/05/2020

SBS News

Media

Don’t forget ACT’s horrendous Indigenous prison record

3/05/2020

The Canberra Times

Media

Indigenous incarceration: a national disgrace and nobody cares

26/04/2020

The Canberra Times

Article

COVID urgency and calls for release

21/04/2020

IndigenousX

Media

$50k fellowship to help find solutions to ‘failed system’

12/03/2020

Bryon Shire News

Media

400 deaths, zero convictions: Australia’s national shame

26/01/2020

Mamamia

Media

Veronica Nelson Walker’s family laid her to rest not knowing how she died in custody

18/01/2020

ABC News Online

 

​The ALRC forms an advisory committee, or panel of experts, for each Inquiry:

  • Professor Gabrielle Appleby, Faculty of Law, University of New South Wales
  • The Hon. Robert French AC, Chancellor of the University of Western Australia and retired Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia
  • Professor Matthew Groves, Alfred Deakin Professor, Deakin University
  • Ms Sia Lagos, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Registrar, Federal Court of Australia
  • Emerita Professor Kathy Mack, College of Business, Government and Law, Flinders University
  • Mr Tony McAvoy SC, Frederick Jordan Chambers
  • Mr John McKenzie, Legal Services Commissioner for NSW, Office of the Legal Services Commissioner
  • Ms Rowena Orr KC, List G Barristers
  • Dr Marian Sullivan, Psychiatrist and former part-time member of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal
  • Mr Chin Tan, Race Discrimination Commissioner, Australian Human Rights Commission

​The ALRC forms an advisory committee, or panel of experts, for each Inquiry:

  • Professor Elise Bant, University of Western Australia Law School
  • Mr Alan Cameron AO, Chairperson, New South Wales Law Reform Commission
  • Ms Shannon Finch, General Counsel, Westpac Group; and Executive member, Law Council of Australia
  • Dr Andrew Godwin, Principal Fellow, University of Melbourne Law School
  • The Hon Kenneth Hayne AC KC, former Royal Commissioner; and former Justice of the High Court of Australia
  • Ms Bronwyn Livermore, Second Parliamentary Counsel, Office of Parliamentary Counsel
  • Mr Joseph Longo, Chair, Australian Securities and Investments Commission
  • Mr Anthony Seebach, Division Head, Law Division, Department of Treasury
  • Mr Mark Steward, Director of Enforcement and Market Oversight, Financial Conduct Authority (United Kingdom)
  • Hon Justice Julie Ward, President of the Court of Appeal, Supreme Court of New South Wales
  • Ms Mohita Zaheed, Acting Division Head, Financial System Division, Department of Treasury

This Inquiry’s final report will be provided to the Attorney-General by 30 November 2023.

September 2020

Terms of Reference received

30 November 2021

Interim Report A tabled in Parliament and publicly released

25 February 2022

Submissions to Interim Report A closed

30 September 2022

Interim Report B tabled in Parliament and publicly released

30 November 2022

Submissions to Interim Report B closed

22 June 2023

Interim Report C tabled in Parliament and publicly released

26 July 2023

Submissions to Interim Report C closed

I, the Hon Christian Porter MP, Attorney-General of Australia, having regard to:

  • the Government’s commitment in response to the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry to simplify financial services laws;
  • the importance, within the context of existing policy settings, of having an adaptive, efficient and navigable legislative framework for corporations and financial services;
  • the need to ensure there is meaningful compliance with the substance and intent of the law; and
  • the continuing emergence of new business models, technologies and practices;

REFER to the Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) for inquiry and report, pursuant to subsection 20(1) of the Australian Law Reform Commission Act 1996 (Cth), a consideration of whether, and if so what, changes to the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and the Corporations Regulations 2001 (Cth) could be made to simplify and rationalise the law, in particular in relation to the matters listed below.

A. The use of definitions in corporations and financial services legislation, including:

  • the circumstances in which it is appropriate for concepts to be defined, consistent with promoting robust regulatory boundaries, understanding and general compliance with the law;
  • the appropriate design of legislative definitions; and
  • the consistent use of terminology to reflect the same or similar concepts.

B. The coherence of the regulatory design and hierarchy of laws, covering primary law provisions, regulations, class orders, and standards, to examine:

  • how legislative complexity can be appropriately managed over time;
  • how best to maintain regulatory flexibility to clarify technical detail and address atypical or unforeseen circumstances and unintended consequences of regulatory arrangements; and
  • how delegated powers should be expressed in legislation, consistent with maintaining an appropriate delegation of legislative authority.

C. How the provisions contained in Chapter 7 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and the Corporations Regulations 2001 (Cth) could be reframed or restructured so that the legislative framework for financial services licensing and regulation:

  • is clearer, coherent and effective;
  • ensures that the intent of the law is met;
  • gives effect to the fundamental norms of behaviour being pursued; and
  • provides an effective framework for conveying how the law applies to consumers and regulated entities and sectors.

Scope of the reference

The ALRC should identify and have regard to existing reports and inquiries, and any associated Government responses, including:

  • the 2019 Final Report of the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry;
  • the 2017 Report of the Treasury’s ASIC Enforcement Review Taskforce;
  • the 2015 Final Report of the Australian Government Competition Policy Review;
  • the 2014 Final Report of the Financial System Inquiry;
  • the 2014 Final Report of the Productivity Commission, Access to Justice Arrangements; and
  • any other inquiries or reviews that it considers relevant.

Consultation

The ALRC should consult widely including with regulatory bodies, the financial services sector, business and other representative bodies, consumer groups, other civil society organisations, and academics. The ALRC should produce consultation documents to ensure experts, stakeholders and the community have the opportunity to contribute to the review.

Timeframe for reporting

The ALRC should provide a consolidated final report to the Attorney-General by 30 November 2023, and interim reports on each discrete matter according to the following timeframes:

  • 30 November 2021 for Topic A;
  • 30 September 2022 for Topic B;
  • 25 August 2023 for Topic C.

The Final Report was tabled in Parliament on 18 January 2024
Read the Final Report here.

The ALRC was asked to inquire into the potential simplification of laws that regulate financial services in Australia.

The Inquiry was part of the Government’s response to the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry released in February 2019. The ALRC was not tasked with recommending policy changes regarding the content of obligations on financial service providers. Rather, the inquiry was more technical in nature, and sought to facilitate a more adaptive, efficient, and navigable framework of legislation “within the context of existing policy settings”. The ultimate goal of reform is to promote meaningful compliance with the substance and intent of the law.

The Terms of Reference focused on the provisions of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and the Corporations Regulations 2001 (Cth) while also referring to other financial services legislation, and legislative instruments. Three sub-topics are specifically outlined, each of which was the subject of an interim report by the ALRC, prior to release of the consolidated Final Report:

  • A first interim report focusing on the appropriate use of definitions in corporations and financial services legislation was published on 30 November 2021;
  • A second interim report focusing on regulatory design and the hierarchy of primary law provisions, regulations, class orders, and standards, was published on September 2022;
  • A third interim report focusing on potential reframing or restructuring of Chapter 7 of the Corporations Act was published on 22 June 2023.

The ALRC’s work complements the ongoing work of the Department of Treasury (Cth) in seeking to simplify relevant legislation.

Contact Us

For enquiries, please email  [email protected].

Subscribe to eNews
 View all Inquiry Publications

 

 

 

September 2020 Terms of Reference received
30 April 2021 Consultation Paper released
30 April 2021 Submissions opened
21 June 2021 Amended Terms of Reference received*
(changing reporting deadline to 30 September or two months after delivery of the High Court’s judgment in Charisteas v Charisteas, whichever is later)
30 June 2021 Submissions closed
30 September 2021

Amended Terms of Reference received*
(changing reporting deadline to 6 December 2021)

6 December 2021

Final Report delivered to the Attorney-General

2 August 2022 Final Report tabled in Parliament and publicly released